27 May 2012, 06:25
Recent proposal by
Vsevolod Chaplin to impose a “church tithe” in Russia caused more smiles than to
protests, which have become the natural reaction to the initiatives of the
Russian Orthodox Church chief PR-executive of late. Comments regarding the
occasion may be reduced to a simple thesis that “we are about to find out the
real number of true believers in Russia”. Having smiled with everyone else, I
decided to peek at our European neighbors in order to understand how the
educated European Union funds its churches (of which there are aplenty). Here I
would like to share the results of my research with the progressive
public.
Church tax
happened to be the most widely spread economic model there. However, six EU
member-states directly fund its churches. These countries are Belgium, Czech
Republic, Greece, Luxemburg and Slovakia. The term “church tax” describes two
primary church-funding models through the secular taxation system. The first
one is based upon the imposition of a mandatory income tax for everyone, who
has officially declared its membership in the respective religious community. The
most prominent example of that is the German model, where the church tax instituted
by the FRG Bill of 1949, which, in turn, was based upon the 19th
century legislation. At the present time tax rate is 8% of the income for the Landkreise with the greatest number of
believers (Bavaria and Baden-Württemberg) and 9% for the rest of them. Besides,
in case of excessive funding and given the consent of the respective church
authorities, this rate may be reduced down to 2.75%–3.5%. For instance, in 2010
incomes of the Evangelical Church made up €4.3 billion thanks to this church
tax, while the incomes of Roman Catholic Church made up €4.9 billion. Apart
from covering its expenditures, churches are to use this money to fund charity
activities. Churches of German-speaking (Austria and Switzerland) and
Scandinavian (Denmark, Finland and Sweden) are funded in the similar manner. German
and Danish budgets also finance the religion lessons in schools, upkeep the religious
educational institutions and maintain the monuments of the past, possessed by
the churches (in Denmark about 13% of all church incomes are spent on that). In
Spain, Holland, Italy and, of late, Hungary another form of church tax is in
effect. It is based upon the voluntary deductions of a certain part of the tax
in favor of religious organizations.
Church tax rate
|
Voluntary donations of a part of
income tax
|
No church tax – direct state grants
|
State and church property is segregated
|
Austria (1,1%)
|
|||
Denmark (up to 1,51%)
|
Spain
(0,5239%)
|
Belgium
|
France
|
Finland (1-2%)
|
Holland (1-3%)
|
Czech Republic
|
Ireland
|
Germany (8-9%)
|
Hungary
(1%)
|
Greece
|
Portugal
|
Switzerland (up to 2,3%)
|
Italy (0,8%)
|
Luxemburg
|
|
Sweden (up to 2%)
|
Slovakia
|
In fact, we may
use any European form of funding the churches, if it doesn’t infringe upon the
interests of secular taxpayers and allows the believers to voluntarily donate
money, according to their beliefs. At that, we have to keep two important
principles in mind:
1. That sort of funding
must absolutely necessarily be transparent and the state is to retain the right to control the spending.
2. Each and every religious
organization of our multi-confessional country must be able to exercise this
right of funding.
No comments:
Post a Comment